Fog machines create a visible vapor commonly used for atmospheric effects in entertainment, photography, and industrial applications. These devices typically use either water-based fluids or glycol-based fluids to produce this effect. While the intent is visual, the resulting vapor can sometimes trigger devices designed to detect smoke. Water-based fog is less likely to cause an issue than denser glycol-based fog which can linger in the air and potentially scatter light particles similarly to smoke.
Understanding the potential interaction between vapor-producing devices and fire safety systems is crucial for both event organizers and homeowners. Unnecessary alarm activations can disrupt events, cause inconvenience, and potentially lead to costly false alarm fines. Furthermore, repeated false alarms can desensitize individuals to the sound of the alarm, increasing the risk of ignoring a genuine fire emergency. Historically, fire detection systems have relied on ionization and photoelectric sensors. While these technologies have saved countless lives, they are not always sophisticated enough to differentiate between theatrical fog and actual smoke.
This article will explore the different types of fog machines and fluids available, their effects on various smoke alarm technologies, and best practices for mitigating the risk of unwanted alarm activation. It will also examine the science behind smoke detection and the development of more advanced sensors capable of distinguishing between true fire hazards and artificial fog effects.
1. Fog Density
Fog density plays a critical role in determining whether a fog machine triggers a smoke alarm. Density refers to the concentration of fog particles within a given volume of air. Higher density fogs, appearing thicker and more opaque, contain a greater number of these particles. This increased concentration elevates the likelihood of interaction with smoke detectors, potentially leading to an alarm. The underlying mechanism involves the scattering or obscuration of light beams within photoelectric detectors, or the interference with ion flow in ionization-type detectors. The denser the fog, the greater the disruption, increasing the probability of an alarm signal.
Consider a theatrical production utilizing a fog machine to create a dramatic, low-lying fog effect. A high-density fog, while visually impactful, significantly increases the risk of setting off smoke alarms. Conversely, a light haze, generated with a lower-density fog, provides atmosphere without substantially impacting detector functionality. A similar principle applies to other scenarios, such as photography or industrial applications. Understanding the relationship between fog density and alarm sensitivity allows for informed decisions regarding fluid choice and machine output.
Effectively managing fog density requires careful consideration of factors such as fluid composition, machine settings, and ventilation. Selecting fluids formulated to produce lower density fogs can mitigate the risk of triggering alarms. Adjusting machine output and ensuring adequate ventilation helps dissipate the fog more rapidly, reducing the particle concentration in the air. These considerations are crucial for responsible and effective fog machine usage, balancing desired visual effects with fire safety precautions. Neglecting density management could lead to disruptions, false alarms, and potential safety hazards.
2. Particle Size
The size of the particles emitted by a fog machine plays a significant role in determining whether smoke alarms are likely to be triggered. Different fog fluids and machine designs produce varying particle sizes, influencing how these particles interact with smoke detection systems. Understanding this relationship is crucial for effective fog utilization while minimizing the risk of false alarms.
-
Micron Size and Detection Sensitivity
Particle size is typically measured in microns (m). Smoke detectors are designed to respond to particles within a specific size range, typically associated with combustion products. Fog particles, depending on the fluid and machine, can fall within or near this sensitive range. Smaller particles, closer to the size of smoke particles, are more likely to scatter light within photoelectric detectors or interfere with the ionization process in ionization detectors, thus increasing the probability of alarm activation. Larger particles, however, tend to settle more quickly and are less likely to interact with the detectors.
-
Fluid Composition and Particle Size Distribution
Different fog fluids produce varying particle size distributions. Glycol-based fluids often generate smaller, more persistent particles compared to water-based fluids. This difference contributes to the higher likelihood of glycol-based fogs triggering smoke alarms. Water-based fogs, with their larger particle sizes, dissipate more rapidly and pose a lower risk. The specific formulation of the fluid, including additives and chemical composition, further influences particle size characteristics.
-
Impact on Different Detector Types
The impact of particle size varies across different smoke detector technologies. Photoelectric detectors are generally more sensitive to larger particles, while ionization detectors respond more readily to smaller particles. This difference highlights the importance of understanding the specific type of detectors installed in a venue or building when using a fog machine. A fog that might not trigger a photoelectric detector could still activate an ionization detector.
-
Ventilation and Particle Dispersion
Ventilation and airflow patterns significantly influence particle dispersion and concentration. Effective ventilation helps distribute and dilute the fog, reducing the concentration of particles in the vicinity of smoke detectors. This dilution effect can mitigate the risk of triggering alarms, even with smaller particle sizes. Conversely, poor ventilation can lead to localized accumulation of fog, increasing the probability of alarm activation.
The interplay between particle size, fluid composition, detector type, and ventilation determines the overall likelihood of a fog machine setting off a smoke alarm. Careful consideration of these factors is essential for responsible fog machine usage, ensuring both the desired visual effect and the integrity of fire safety systems. Selecting appropriate fluids, adjusting machine output, and ensuring adequate ventilation are crucial steps in minimizing the risk of unwanted alarm activations.
3. Alarm Type
The type of smoke alarm installed plays a crucial role in determining whether a fog machine will trigger it. Different alarm technologies utilize distinct detection mechanisms, leading to varying sensitivities to the particulate matter generated by fog machines. Understanding these differences is essential for mitigating the risk of false alarms.
Ionization Smoke Alarms: These alarms contain a small amount of radioactive material that ionizes the air within the chamber. This ionization creates a current between two electrodes. When smoke particles enter the chamber, they disrupt the ion flow, reducing the current and triggering the alarm. Ionization alarms are generally more sensitive to smaller particles, such as those produced by flaming fires. However, they can also be triggered by the fine particles found in some types of fog, particularly those generated by glycol-based fluids. The density of the fog also plays a significant factor; a dense fog, even if water-based, could potentially trigger an ionization alarm.
Photoelectric Smoke Alarms: These alarms utilize a light source and a light sensor. Under normal conditions, the light beam does not reach the sensor. When smoke particles enter the chamber, they scatter the light, and some of it reaches the sensor, triggering the alarm. Photoelectric alarms are generally more sensitive to larger particles, such as those produced by smoldering fires. They are less prone to false alarms from fog than ionization alarms, especially if the fog is water-based and not excessively dense. However, a very dense fog, regardless of the fluid type, could still scatter enough light to trigger a photoelectric alarm.
Dual-Sensor Smoke Alarms: These alarms combine both ionization and photoelectric technologies, offering broader detection capabilities. They are designed to detect a wider range of fire types, from both flaming and smoldering fires. While offering enhanced fire safety, dual-sensor alarms can also be more susceptible to false alarms from fog machines, as they incorporate the sensitivities of both technologies. Careful consideration of fog density and particle size is crucial when using fog machines in areas with dual-sensor alarms.
Modern advancements such as “smart” smoke detectors utilize more sophisticated algorithms and sensor combinations to minimize nuisance alarms while enhancing fire detection capabilities. Some of these detectors can differentiate between smoke and other airborne particles, thus reducing false alarms from fog machines. This enhanced detection can lead to more targeted deployment of emergency response resources such as fire departments.
Selecting the appropriate type of smoke alarm involves balancing the need for comprehensive fire protection with the potential for nuisance alarms. Understanding the characteristics of different alarm technologies and their respective sensitivities to fog is crucial for informed decision-making. This knowledge, coupled with careful management of fog density and particle size, ensures both effective visual effects and the continued integrity of fire safety systems.
4. Fluid Composition
Fluid composition is a critical factor influencing whether a fog machine triggers smoke alarms. Different fluids produce fogs with varying particle sizes, densities, and other characteristics that affect their interaction with smoke detection systems. Understanding the composition of fog fluids is essential for minimizing the risk of false alarms while achieving the desired visual effects.
-
Water-Based Fluids
Water-based fluids primarily consist of deionized water and a glycol or glycerin component. These fluids generally produce larger fog particles that dissipate relatively quickly. Due to the larger particle size and faster dissipation, water-based fogs are less likely to trigger smoke alarms, particularly photoelectric detectors. They are often preferred for applications where minimizing alarm sensitivity is crucial, such as indoor events or theatrical productions.
-
Glycol-Based Fluids
Glycol-based fluids utilize propylene glycol or other glycols as their primary ingredient. These fluids tend to produce denser fogs with smaller particles that linger longer in the air. The smaller particle size and increased density heighten the risk of triggering smoke alarms, especially ionization detectors. While the denser fog can create more dramatic effects, it necessitates careful consideration of ventilation and alarm placement.
-
Mineral Oil-Based Fluids
Mineral oil-based fluids, sometimes referred to as “cracker” fluids, produce a dense, white fog often used in theatrical special effects. These fluids create a very persistent fog with varying particle sizes, and are highly likely to trigger most types of smoke alarms. Their use typically requires close coordination with fire safety officials and adherence to strict safety protocols.
-
Fluid Additives
Additives within fog fluids can influence particle size, density, and other characteristics relevant to smoke alarm activation. Some additives enhance fog persistence or alter its color, potentially affecting its interaction with detectors. Understanding the specific additives present in a fluid and their potential impact on smoke alarms is essential for informed decision-making. For example, some additives may increase particle density, making the fog more likely to trigger an alarm.
The choice of fog fluid is a crucial consideration for anyone operating a fog machine. Balancing the desired visual effect with the need to avoid false alarms requires careful selection of fluid composition based on the specific application, venue characteristics, and installed smoke detection systems. Prioritizing fire safety considerations and adhering to relevant regulations ensure responsible and effective fog machine usage.
5. Ventilation
Ventilation plays a crucial role in mitigating the risk of fog machine-triggered smoke alarm activations. Effective ventilation systems manage airflow, influencing fog particle concentration and distribution within a space. This management directly impacts the likelihood of particles interacting with smoke detectors and potentially causing unwanted alarms.
-
Air Exchange Rate
The air exchange rate, measured in air changes per hour (ACH), quantifies how frequently the air within a space is replaced. Higher ACH values indicate more rapid air exchange, effectively diluting and removing fog particles. Increasing the air exchange rate through mechanical ventilation, such as HVAC systems, or natural ventilation, such as opening windows and doors, can significantly reduce the likelihood of smoke alarm activation. A higher ACH effectively clears the air of fog particles, preventing their accumulation near detectors. For instance, a large venue with a high ACH may safely accommodate more fog output than a smaller, poorly ventilated space.
-
Airflow Patterns
Understanding and managing airflow patterns within a space is essential for effective fog dispersion and minimizing alarm sensitivity. Directing airflow away from smoke detectors prevents fog particles from concentrating in their vicinity. Strategic placement of fans and vents can create airflow pathways that guide fog away from detectors, reducing the chance of triggering an alarm. For example, positioning fans to draw fog away from the ceiling where detectors are often located can minimize unwanted activations. Similarly, avoiding stagnant air pockets, where fog can accumulate, reduces localized high concentrations of fog particles.
-
Ventilation System Design
The design of the ventilation system itself influences fog dispersion and smoke detector sensitivity. Systems incorporating proper filtration and exhaust mechanisms help remove fog particles efficiently, reducing their overall concentration. A well-designed system can also contribute to consistent airflow patterns, minimizing areas of high particle concentration. For instance, a system incorporating high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters can trap fog particles, reducing the likelihood of alarm activation. Similarly, a balanced ventilation system with appropriately sized ducts and vents ensures effective distribution and removal of fog.
-
Interaction with Fog Machine Placement
The placement of fog machines in relation to ventilation outlets and smoke detectors is crucial. Positioning fog machines near exhaust vents facilitates rapid removal of fog particles, while avoiding placement near detectors minimizes direct exposure. This strategic placement optimizes ventilation effectiveness and reduces the likelihood of false alarms. For instance, placing a fog machine near a stage vent allows the fog to be drawn out quickly, while positioning it away from ceiling-mounted detectors minimizes the chance of triggering them.
Proper ventilation is an essential consideration for anyone operating a fog machine. Understanding airflow dynamics, managing air exchange rates, and strategically placing equipment are crucial for minimizing the risk of smoke alarm activations. Implementing appropriate ventilation strategies ensures both effective visual effects and the continued integrity of fire safety systems.
6. Airflow Patterns
Airflow patterns within a venue significantly influence the distribution and concentration of fog generated by fog machines, directly impacting the likelihood of smoke alarm activation. Understanding and managing these patterns are crucial for preventing unwanted alarms while achieving desired atmospheric effects. The direction, velocity, and overall circulation of air within a space determine how fog particles disperse, interact with detectors, and potentially trigger alarms.
-
Natural Convection
Natural convection, driven by temperature differences, creates upward air currents as warm air rises and cooler air descends. This natural upward movement can carry fog particles towards ceiling-mounted smoke detectors, increasing the risk of activation. In venues with high ceilings and significant temperature gradients, natural convection can play a substantial role in fog distribution and alarm sensitivity. For instance, in a theater with stage lighting generating heat, the resulting upward airflow can carry fog towards ceiling-mounted detectors.
-
Forced Air Movement
Forced air movement, generated by fans, HVAC systems, or other mechanical means, introduces controlled airflow patterns that can either exacerbate or mitigate the risk of smoke alarm activation. Directing airflow away from detectors helps prevent fog accumulation in their vicinity, reducing the likelihood of triggering an alarm. Conversely, poorly directed airflow can concentrate fog particles near detectors, increasing sensitivity. For example, ceiling fans can create downdrafts that push fog away from detectors, while improperly positioned vents can direct fog towards them.
-
Stagnant Air Pockets
Stagnant air pockets, areas with minimal air circulation, allow fog to accumulate and concentrate, increasing the risk of localized high particle densities. These localized concentrations can trigger nearby smoke detectors, even if the overall fog density in the venue is relatively low. Identifying and eliminating stagnant air pockets through strategic ventilation or airflow management is crucial for minimizing unwanted alarm activations. For example, corners or alcoves with limited airflow can trap fog, creating high concentrations near detectors.
-
Interaction with Ventilation Systems
The interaction between airflow patterns and ventilation systems is crucial for effective fog management. Well-designed ventilation systems, coupled with strategic airflow management, can effectively dilute and remove fog particles, minimizing the risk of alarm activation. Conversely, poorly designed or improperly operated ventilation systems can exacerbate the problem by concentrating fog in certain areas. For example, an HVAC system with properly positioned return vents can effectively draw fog away from sensitive areas, while a system with inadequate exhaust capacity can allow fog to accumulate.
By understanding and managing airflow patterns, one can significantly reduce the risk of fog machines triggering smoke alarms. Strategic placement of fog machines and ventilation equipment, combined with careful consideration of natural and forced air movement, allows for effective fog utilization while maintaining the integrity of fire safety systems. Neglecting airflow patterns can lead to unwanted alarm activations, disruptions, and potential safety hazards.
7. Alarm Placement
Alarm placement is a critical factor influencing the likelihood of a fog machine triggering a smoke detector. The proximity of a smoke detector to a fog machine’s output directly affects the concentration of fog particles the detector encounters. Positioning detectors too close to fog machines increases the risk of false alarms, even with less dense fogs. Conversely, strategic placement minimizes exposure to fog, reducing unnecessary activations. Consider a scenario where a smoke detector is placed directly above a fog machine. Even a small amount of fog is likely to trigger the alarm due to the high concentration of particles in that immediate area. Relocating the detector even a short distance away, or directing airflow to divert the fog, can significantly reduce this risk.
Optimal alarm placement necessitates considering airflow patterns and ventilation systems. Detectors placed in areas of stagnant air or where airflow directs fog towards them are more susceptible to activation. Conversely, placement in well-ventilated areas, or areas where airflow diverts fog away from the detector, minimizes this risk. For example, in a theater, placing detectors near air return vents helps draw fog away from them, reducing false alarms. Similarly, avoiding placement in corners or alcoves where fog might accumulate improves system reliability. Understanding the interplay between alarm placement, airflow, and fog distribution enables effective mitigation strategies.
Effective alarm placement balances the need for comprehensive fire detection with minimizing nuisance alarms from fog machines. Strategic placement requires careful consideration of venue layout, airflow dynamics, fog machine placement, and the specific type of smoke detector employed. Consultation with fire safety professionals ensures compliance with local codes and optimizes system effectiveness. Neglecting these factors can compromise both fire safety and the smooth execution of events or productions utilizing fog effects.
8. Testing Procedures
Testing procedures are crucial for determining the interaction between fog machines and smoke alarms within a specific environment. These procedures involve controlled activation of the fog machine while observing the response of the installed smoke detection system. A comprehensive testing procedure considers variables such as fog density, fluid type, ventilation settings, airflow patterns, and alarm placement. Such testing allows for the identification of potential issues and the implementation of preventative measures before a full-scale event or production. For instance, a test run might reveal that a particular glycol-based fluid triggers alarms at a lower density than anticipated, necessitating adjustments to fluid choice or machine output. Similarly, testing can identify areas where airflow patterns concentrate fog near detectors, informing adjustments to ventilation or fan placement.
Effective testing procedures replicate real-world scenarios as closely as possible. This includes using the same fog fluid, machine settings, and ventilation configurations planned for the actual event. Testing at various fog densities and durations provides a comprehensive understanding of the system’s response under different conditions. For example, a theatrical production might involve scenes with both light hazes and dense fog effects. Testing both scenarios ensures the system responds appropriately in each case. Documentation of test results, including alarm activation times, fog density levels, and environmental conditions, provides valuable data for future reference and adjustments. This documentation enables informed decision-making regarding fluid choices, machine operation, and ventilation strategies, optimizing both visual effects and fire safety.
Thorough testing procedures are essential for responsible fog machine usage. They provide valuable insights into the complex interplay between fog, airflow, and smoke detection systems, allowing for informed adjustments that minimize the risk of unwanted alarm activations. Neglecting proper testing can lead to disruptions, false alarms, and potential safety hazards during events or productions. Systematic testing procedures are an integral part of ensuring both effective visual effects and the continued integrity of fire safety systems.
9. Safety Regulations
Safety regulations pertaining to fog machine usage are intrinsically linked to the potential for triggering smoke alarms. These regulations, often codified in local fire codes and venue-specific guidelines, aim to mitigate the risks associated with false alarms and ensure the continued effectiveness of fire safety systems. A primary concern is the potential for fog to obscure or interfere with smoke detection, delaying response times in the event of a genuine fire. Regulations address this concern through various stipulations regarding fluid type, fog density, ventilation requirements, and alarm system compatibility. For example, some jurisdictions restrict the use of dense fogs or oil-based fluids due to their higher likelihood of triggering alarms. Similarly, regulations often mandate specific ventilation requirements to ensure adequate fog dispersal and minimize alarm sensitivity. Ignoring these regulations can lead to significant consequences, including fines, venue closures, and increased liability in the event of an incident.
Real-world examples underscore the importance of adhering to safety regulations. In numerous instances, unauthorized or improperly managed fog machine usage has resulted in unwanted alarm activations, disrupting events, causing unnecessary evacuations, and diverting emergency resources. Such incidents highlight the potential for confusion and disruption when fog triggers alarms, potentially leading to complacency among occupants who may misinterpret a genuine fire alarm as another false alarm. Furthermore, repeated false alarms can desensitize building occupants to the sound of the alarm, increasing the risk of ignoring a genuine emergency. In venues with sophisticated fire suppression systems, activation by fog can lead to unintended discharge of suppressants, causing property damage and further disruption. These real-world consequences emphasize the practical significance of understanding and adhering to safety regulations related to fog machine operation.
Adherence to safety regulations is paramount for responsible fog machine usage. Regulations provide a framework for minimizing the risk of false alarms, ensuring the continued effectiveness of fire detection systems, and protecting building occupants. Understanding the rationale behind these regulations and their practical implications is crucial for event organizers, venue operators, and anyone utilizing fog machines. Compliance not only mitigates legal and financial risks but also contributes to a safer environment for all. Regularly consulting local fire codes and venue-specific guidelines ensures compliance with current regulations and promotes best practices in fog machine operation. This proactive approach to safety reinforces the crucial role of fog machine users in maintaining a safe and enjoyable environment for everyone.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the interaction between fog machines and smoke alarms, providing concise and informative responses.
Question 1: What types of fog machines are most likely to trigger smoke alarms?
Machines utilizing glycol-based fluids or producing dense fogs, regardless of fluid type, pose the greatest risk of triggering alarms. Mineral oil-based fogs are almost certain to activate detectors.
Question 2: How can the risk of triggering smoke alarms be minimized when using a fog machine?
Using water-based fluids, optimizing ventilation, strategically directing airflow away from detectors, and employing proper testing procedures can significantly reduce the risk.
Question 3: Do all types of smoke alarms react similarly to fog?
No. Ionization alarms are generally more sensitive to smaller particles, making them more susceptible to activation by fog than photoelectric alarms. Dual-sensor alarms, incorporating both technologies, can be even more sensitive.
Question 4: Are there specific regulations regarding fog machine usage and smoke alarms?
Yes. Local fire codes and venue-specific guidelines often stipulate permissible fluid types, fog densities, and ventilation requirements. Compliance with these regulations is crucial.
Question 5: What are the potential consequences of triggering a smoke alarm with a fog machine?
Consequences can range from event disruptions and unnecessary evacuations to fines and potential legal liabilities, particularly if regulations are violated.
Question 6: How does testing help prevent fog machines from setting off smoke alarms?
Testing identifies potential issues beforehand. By simulating real-world scenarios, appropriate adjustments can be made to fluid choices, machine settings, and ventilation configurations, minimizing the risk of unwanted activations.
Understanding the factors influencing the interaction between fog machines and smoke alarms is crucial for responsible and effective use. Prioritizing fire safety and adhering to established regulations ensures a safe environment while achieving desired atmospheric effects.
For further information or specific guidance regarding local regulations, consult with fire safety professionals or venue management.
Tips for Using Fog Machines Without Triggering Smoke Alarms
The following tips provide practical guidance for minimizing the risk of fog machines activating smoke detectors, ensuring both effective visual effects and the integrity of fire safety systems.
Tip 1: Opt for Water-Based Fluids: Water-based fluids produce larger fog particles that dissipate more quickly than glycol-based fluids, reducing the likelihood of alarm activation. This choice is particularly suitable for smaller venues or settings with sensitive detectors.
Tip 2: Prioritize Adequate Ventilation: Effective ventilation systems dilute and remove fog particles, minimizing their interaction with smoke detectors. Increasing air exchange rates through mechanical or natural ventilation is crucial.
Tip 3: Strategically Direct Airflow: Position fans and vents to direct airflow away from smoke detectors, preventing fog accumulation in their vicinity. This strategy is particularly important in areas with stagnant air or complex airflow patterns.
Tip 4: Conduct Thorough Testing: Replicate real-world scenarios during testing procedures to identify potential issues and optimize machine settings, fluid choices, and ventilation configurations.
Tip 5: Carefully Consider Alarm Placement: Avoid placing detectors directly above or near fog machines. Consider airflow patterns and ventilation systems when determining optimal detector placement.
Tip 6: Consult Local Regulations and Venue Guidelines: Adhere to all applicable fire codes and venue-specific regulations regarding fog machine usage. These regulations often stipulate permissible fluid types, fog densities, and ventilation requirements.
Tip 7: Select Appropriate Fog Density: Adjust fog machine output to achieve the desired visual effect while minimizing the risk of triggering alarms. Lower density fogs generally pose less risk than dense, opaque fogs.
Tip 8: Maintain Proper Equipment: Regular maintenance of fog machines ensures optimal performance and reduces the risk of malfunctions that could lead to excessive fog output or unintended particle sizes.
Implementing these tips enhances safety and minimizes disruptions caused by unwanted smoke alarm activations. Careful consideration of fluid choices, ventilation, airflow, and alarm placement contributes to a safer and more effective use of fog machines.
By prioritizing these precautions, event organizers and fog machine operators contribute to a safer environment while achieving desired atmospheric effects. This proactive approach reinforces the importance of responsible fog machine usage in maintaining both visual impact and fire safety integrity.
Does a Fog Machine Set Off Smoke Alarms? A Conclusion
The potential for fog machines to activate smoke alarms depends on a complex interplay of factors. Fluid composition, fog density, particle size, alarm type, ventilation, airflow patterns, alarm placement, and adherence to safety regulations all contribute to the likelihood of an alarm event. While water-based fluids and less dense fogs generally pose a lower risk, the potential for activation remains, especially with sensitive ionization or dual-sensor alarms. Proper ventilation and strategic airflow management are crucial for mitigating this risk, as is careful consideration of alarm placement relative to fog machine output. Thorough testing procedures, replicating real-world scenarios, allow for informed adjustments and minimize the likelihood of unwanted activations.
Ultimately, responsible fog machine operation requires a comprehensive understanding of these interacting factors. Prioritizing fire safety and adhering to established regulations are paramount. Balancing the desired atmospheric effects with the need to maintain the integrity of fire detection systems is crucial not only for preventing disruptions but also for ensuring the safety of all occupants. Continued research into sensor technology and fluid formulations may further refine this balance in the future, enabling more sophisticated differentiation between theatrical fog and genuine fire hazards.
